advertisement
TODAYMoms Home
  • TODAYMoms Home
  • TODAYMoms Blog
{"contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"community"}

6-year-old suspended over utensil granted a reprieve

A Delaware school board voted unanimously to change the no-tolerance weapons policy that landed first-grader Zarchary Christie a 45-day supsension for bringing his favorite camping untensil to school. Under the new policy, kindergartners and first-graders who bring weapons to school or commit other violent offenses will be suspended for three to five days. That means Zachary is free to rejoin his fellow classmates rather than attend reform school for the next month. He will, however, have have to leave his camping spoon-knife-fork combo at home.

Because the case has received wide-spread publicity (Zachary appeared on TODAY yesterday), his mom, Debbie, debated whether or not to send Zachary to school today. However, we got a text from Debbie this morning saying Zachary was on his way to class. As Matt Lauer put it, he will probably be carried into the school on the shoulders of his classmates...at least metaphorically.

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy


{"contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"community"}
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
Jump to discussion page: 1 2
{"commentId":10076111,"authorDomain":"torgo2009"}
torgo2009Deleted
{"commentId":10076714,"authorDomain":"tripod88"}

"zero tolerance" ok, but how 'bout some common sense folks? the kid's not Dillinger!!! and i don't want to hear anything about "if it was a child of color" GET REAL. what a nutty world we live in. people have lost the ability to use their brains. whew! drop me off on an uninhabited island in the Carribean and leave me alone. torgo.........i think you have a couple of wires touching that shoudn't be.

{"commentId":10076714,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"tripod88"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:05 PM EDT
{"commentId":10076973,"authorDomain":"torgo2009"}
torgo2009Deleted
{"commentId":10120595,"authorDomain":"murf-1416188"}

Yep, and in the 50s, every schoolboy had a pocketknife...but they also had parents who taught them when and how to use them. My mom always had a .22 pistol under her mattress, it would NEVER have occurred to me to take it out for any reason whatsoever. My dad also had a couple of pistols, and I was a very curious, into-things kind of kid, but I wasn't even aware he had them they were so well hidden.

Thank goodness the school board acted responsibly in this case. Recently, I had a very similar thing happen to my son (who was in 6th at the time) and the principal realized there was no intent to use the pocket knife, it was brought to school completely by accident, and let my son off with just the couple days suspension. I have the pocketknife now; his only "crime" was not thinking before putting fun things into his new schoolbag and then not taking everything out before actually going to school with it.

{"commentId":10120595,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"murf-1416188"}
    #2.2 - Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:23 PM EDT
    {"commentId":10167838,"authorDomain":"Mom1420387"}

    Thanks murf and tripod. Common sense Should be the key in situations such as this. Some years ago, my son, 6th grade, also had the same type of issue. He took a paring knife to school to cut his kiwi fruit. That was his only intention and he seemed baffled as to why the grown ups were so upset. Before this incident he had been #2 academically in his previous school and an altar server at church. It was all down-hill from there and the incident, followed him through high school where he finally dropped out.

    You are right. Kids don't think about their actions sometimes and all kids need to be educated at an early age, these days, about current laws and amendments to laws.

    {"commentId":10167838,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"Mom1420387"}
    • 1 vote
    #2.3 - Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:42 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":10077457,"authorDomain":"adkins"}

    This has been blown way way way out of purportion. The kid made a mistake and cooler heads prevailed.

    {"commentId":10077457,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"adkins"}
    • 5 votes
    Reply#3 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:37 PM EDT
    {"commentId":10077835,"authorDomain":"don-wright-1411211"}

    What an incredible display, by an institution supposedly teaching and guiding children, of ignoring child psychological maturity/developmental facts. 45 days in reform school? I would certainly home school or find alternative organizations to intrust with the well-being of my six year old child than the one above for which my tax dollars were paying.

    {"commentId":10077835,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"don-wright-1411211"}
    • 4 votes
    Reply#4 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:51 PM EDT
    {"commentId":10079291,"authorDomain":"johnjpowell"}

    Those who think this makes complete sense probably also believe that zero tolerance would have also prevented the Columbine High School massacre. There just isn't a logical connection. It may FEEL good but it is not the solution.

    {"commentId":10079291,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"johnjpowell"}
    • 3 votes
    Reply#5 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:44 PM EDT
    {"commentId":10079366,"authorDomain":"Aerica"}

    He absolutely should not be punished! He did not take the tool to school with the slightest thought of hurting someone. That was not in his heart so why punish the boy for something he never intended to do in the first place. This is a classic example of the good faring with the bad because bad people make things harder for us all. And that line becomes blurred after a while. Because someone has used something to hurt others, now everyone freaks out! Guns have to be used. Knives have to be used. The schools have knives. In the cafeteria to prepare food. So actually knives are at school, literally. If a worker cuts him/herself, or if someone else is accidently hurt, no one is arrested. The incident may be investigated, but accidents do happen. Had a child got hurt with his tool, as long as the injury was accidental, these things happen. People have started to blame the object for wrongdoing INSTEAD of one's actions or intent. Of course, what can one expect when society leans upon their own understanding instead of accepting truth of matters, which is actually our reality. I'm glad the kid got a reprieve. Don't rob the kids of their innocence because your scared of your own sins. LOL

    {"commentId":10079366,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"Aerica"}
    • 3 votes
    Reply#6 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:47 PM EDT
    {"commentId":12176738,"authorDomain":"hale-me75"}

    A rule is a rule and even at 6 they can be taught not to take things to school that are wrong. Yes he liked to eat with it but should have been taught it is only for home and camping. A 6 year old can be taught that. Yes reform school would be too harsh a punishment but a couple of days of suspension would have done it. Rules have to be the same for all students don't care what color they are. The biggest problem is that an older child could have taken it away from him and hurt some one. There are a lot of things that can happen. A knife has no place in school even if just want to use it to eat.If you allow one to bring in a knife even if it is on with other utensils then have to allow others to bring them in. My son at age 6 had a twenty two and shot frogs and squirrels. But he was given a gun safety course and wasn't allowed to go hunting with it loaded. he had to have his bullet in his pocket and sit by a tree then load it and Waite for the squirrels, or at the pond the same thing for hunting frogs. He loved frog legs to eat. Yes I did follow him often without his knowing to make sure he followed the rule.So a 6 year old can learn right from wrong and rules to follow. The only thing I had to check him for in the mornings was for onions, he loved to eat them like apples and the smell was offencive to others,lol at that one.

    {"commentId":12176738,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"hale-me75"}
      #6.1 - Thu Feb 4, 2010 12:43 PM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":10079493,"authorDomain":"corneliaseigneur"}
      Cornelia Seigneur-RealLifeMomDeleted
      {"commentId":10080030,"authorDomain":"sonja600"}

      Unbelievable! 45 days in a reform school????? What happened to a little bit of common sense? I am so sorry that a 6 year old had to go through all that mess. One good thing, by national attention maybe common sense will be brought back to the schools.

      {"commentId":10080030,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"sonja600"}
      • 4 votes
      Reply#8 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:13 PM EDT
      {"commentId":10080351,"authorDomain":"z1r2p3"}

      Zero tolerance is ZERO tolerance. It is not fair to judge on a case by case basis. If no knifes are allowed at school, that is what that means, NO KNIFES. The only thing this kid learned from this experience is that if you whine and complain enough, you will get out of your punishment and get your way. What happens when another first grader at this school brings a knife to class and someone is hurt, even if it is accidentally? Does every kid now get one free warning when bringing a weapon to school?

      {"commentId":10080351,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"z1r2p3"}
      • 2 votes
      Reply#9 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:26 PM EDT
      {"commentId":10080985,"authorDomain":"disangro"}

      Illiterate,ignorant AND stupid robot asshat.

      Do you lace your shoeses and pick your noseses with your fingerses or your toeses

      Go stabseses yourselfs to death with some kitchen knifes,Yo.

      {"commentId":10080985,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"disangro"}
      • 1 vote
      #9.1 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:57 PM EDT
      {"commentId":10082778,"authorDomain":"z1r2p3"}

      The rules are the rules. It is arrogant jerks like you, who thinks the rules don't apply to them, that makes the zero tolerance policy necessary. One bad apple ruins it for everyone. And you sound like a real rotten apple!

      {"commentId":10082778,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"z1r2p3"}
      • 1 vote
      #9.2 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 4:13 PM EDT
      {"commentId":10088531,"authorDomain":"notavalid"}

      The rules are idiotic if they make no allowance for intent. Zero tolerance is the end of thinking and applying rules in anything resembling a sensible manner.

      Should the kid have brought the knife to school? Probably not, and it can easily be handled by taking the kit away - he's six for $deity's sake.

      How is 45 days in reform school a reasonable response?

      {"commentId":10088531,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"notavalid"}
      • 2 votes
      #9.3 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 9:29 PM EDT
      {"commentId":10098787,"authorDomain":"ttuxo"}

      z1r2p3- You obviously are uneducated and do not know what you are talking about.

      First of all, it is KNIVES, not KNIFES.

      Secondly, the judgment on a "case by case" basis was implemented after the board changed the policy.

      Thirdly, there is no mention of "whining and complaining". You are adding these facts to the case before you.

      Lastly, this situation does not imply that every kid gets one free warning. There are still plenty of kids who do not get warnings, but subsequently get punished.

      There is a big difference between bringing an eating utensil to school and a semi-automatic. Intent should also be factored in. If a kid wants to hurt a kid at school, or more dramatically shoot the whole school up, I highly doubt that a zero tolerance policy will stop them.

      {"commentId":10098787,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"ttuxo"}
      • 1 vote
      #9.4 - Thu Oct 15, 2009 1:07 PM EDT
      {"commentId":10103244,"authorDomain":"z1r2p3"}

      EXCUSE ME!!! Sorry for the misspelling! I am far from uneducated; obviously YOU have a zero tolerance policy for an honest spelling mistake. Yes, I know it is KNIVES and I felt like a dork once I submitted it and read it to myself. Anyway, the fact that the parents were on the Today Show complaining about the school's decision came across to me as "whining and complaining" as if they were saying the rules should be overlooked for their child. Yes, I agree with you that there is a big difference between bringing a semi-automatic and an eating utensil to school. However, this was not just an eating utensil; it was a knife which is a weapon, therefore putting it into the same category as a gun.

      In no way do I think this particular little boy had bad intentions but the rules are the rules. We cannot change the rules every time someone doesn't like them. I feel the 45 days of reform school was extreme but I also do not think the student (and parents) should have gotten off so easily in the end.

      No one is going to take the rules seriously anymore if all you have to do is cry to the media and get out of your punishment. Bottom line, you do something wrong and get caught, suck it up, take your punishment and move on.

      {"commentId":10103244,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"z1r2p3"}
      • 2 votes
      #9.5 - Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:14 PM EDT
      {"commentId":10108081,"authorDomain":"tyg13"}

      Herein lies the problem with zero tolerance policies. The reason why they exist is because people are afraid of there being bias, so they make the punishment for someone with a hunting knife the same for someone with a swiss army knife (which, by the way, he only planned to use for the fork and spoon as there are few things in a school cafeteria that you need a knife for.)

      Therefore, the school itself needs to stop taking the easy way out and start eliminating bias in teachers or appointing people to handle situations, rather than taking it out on the kids. Also, he was a first grader, and I doubt that unless he's a kid with violent tendencies and a criminal record that he's going to take a knife to school and stab someone with it. Its a different case if someone had taken it from him to hurt someone else, but that never happened.

      45 days in reform school is also pretty harsh for a little kid, after all, he's an A student and having to spend over a month with kids that are "hooligans" could get very, very irritating. I think that he should've gotten something like a detention to show him that he wasn't allowed to bring that to school anymore. And z1r2p3, crying to the media is admittedly rather underhanded and low, but the punishment was blown out of proportion and the parents didn't seek them out (as far as I know, correct me if I'm wrong, please.)

      {"commentId":10108081,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"tyg13"}
      • 1 vote
      #9.6 - Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:35 PM EDT
      {"commentId":10116705,"authorDomain":"bakaguy"}

      What about when he is in High School and they need to use scalpels to disect things with in Biology? Should the students be thrown out for holding them as well? I was attacked by a student with one of the scalpels and narrowly missed a deep infectious cut (those things are filthy). However, it was just ONE moron who did it. If we are to have zero tollerance in schools, where does it end? Pretty soon you will see zero tollerance pop in an a lot of places. What was once the land of the free is now the land of the laws rules and regulations dictating how you will live your life.

      {"commentId":10116705,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"bakaguy"}
        #9.7 - Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:47 AM EDT
        {"commentId":12177161,"authorDomain":"hale-me75"}

        We are the land of the free, but even in the land of the free you have to have rules to live by or else you would have to let all the criminals out of jail and child molesters go free, This is a little Strong but can see why they say no knifes or guns in school and yes if a person really wants to hurt or shoot some one they will get the gun illegally and do it. If taught right from wrong in the first place all of this wouldn't be happening. Parents are to blame for a lot of things. Not teaching the children as they grow up. You have rules in your homes like bed time rules at the family table, going to school , language that is inappropriate to use. So think about it. Yes reform school would have been bad, but bet even without going to the media the school board would have done the right thing. Suspension for a couple of days and Mother should have taken the loved set away from him for a month also.WE all have rules we have to live by.

        {"commentId":12177161,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"hale-me75"}
          #9.8 - Thu Feb 4, 2010 1:00 PM EST
          Reply
          {"commentId":10080927,"authorDomain":"jsacks"}

          You can't have zero tolerance when dealing with young children like this. In most cases, they don't know they are doing "wrong". This also applies to accusing a young child of "sexual harassment". How can that be? They don't even know the difference between girls and boys at that age! Adults should not be robots and apply so called rules without using their heads. I think the children have more sense than the adults sometimes.

          {"commentId":10080927,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"jsacks"}
          • 2 votes
          Reply#10 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:54 PM EDT
          {"commentId":12177306,"authorDomain":"hale-me75"}

          If parents told them the rules then they would know. This sexual harassment is for the birds, so a 6 year old kisses a 6 year old girl. They know the difference between girls and boys and just kiss them because they like them.It for sure isn't sexual. Some girls like the boy and receive the kiss but most of them don't want to play with boys at that age. It is no big deal. The teacher could just call the boy over and tell him not to do that again and two to one he wouldn't.

          .

          {"commentId":12177306,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"hale-me75"}
            #10.1 - Thu Feb 4, 2010 1:06 PM EST
            Reply
            {"commentId":10081046,"authorDomain":"newt1985"}

            Yes the child did do something he didn't mean to do. I agree parents should have been a little more cautious with him having a knife, even if it was a Boy Scout utensil. However, children his age make mistakes, and can learn from them. I don’t agree with the zero tolerance factor. The school should have used better judgment than that, as for the teacher who confiscated it from the boy, maybe you should go back to school. I fear the day of sending my child to school! What are teachers teaching to our children? This example that has happened to the boy should be taken serious and hope that the school will learn some commonsense. Don’t misunderstand I feel our children need to be safe and in a safe environment; but can you at least use better judgment?

            {"commentId":10081046,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"newt1985"}
            • 1 vote
            Reply#11 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:00 PM EDT
            {"commentId":12177454,"authorDomain":"hale-me75"}

            The teacher was right in taking the knife, but the family should have been notified and knife given to the mother and child suspended for a couple of days and that would have been that . It has been blown out of proportion, and because of this and media brought in, when the school board would have just given the suspension was wrong. The child learned that if you do wrong you can get out of it by going to news. Not taught you have to follow rules. too early to learn that.Makes me wonder if he is taught at home , and has rules there.

            {"commentId":12177454,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"hale-me75"}
              #11.1 - Thu Feb 4, 2010 1:12 PM EST
              Reply
              {"commentId":10081142,"authorDomain":"disangro"}

              Insert question mark onto 2nd line in previous post. Editing function failed.

              BTW, Newsvine dropped or hid the 60 pages of comments on this public school,affirmative action hire fueled travesty. WTF?

              {"commentId":10081142,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"disangro"}
                Reply#12 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:03 PM EDT
                {"commentId":10081499,"authorDomain":"QueenMom"}

                It was 15 years ago when I was a single mother of four, and my 6 year old took his older sister's pocket knife to school. Not to hurt anyone, but like that of this other 6 year old. He was also suspended for 45 days, and the school wanted me to put him in a special program. I did not, instead, I called the school district and arranged for a tutor during the 45 day period. While my young son was suspended, he got A's and B's in his school work. You ask him after he was able to return back to school if he will ever take a knife to school again, his response was,"No way, I could not go to school for 45 days." That was his exact words. I can so sympathize with him and I am sure my son could too. He is now 15.

                {"commentId":10081499,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"QueenMom"}
                • 3 votes
                Reply#13 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:18 PM EDT
                {"commentId":10082369,"authorDomain":"billthedad"}

                Why is everyone trying to down play this by saying he took a Utensil to school. I was a KNIFE. This is straight from Coleman's Website...

                • Includes folding knife, fork, spoon, and bottle opener

                This would not be allowed on a plane and should never be allowed in a school. You have to be 18 to buy it and why??? It's dangerous. His parents should be punished for allowing him to have it. His parents claim it's part of his Cub Scout equipment. They are wrong. It is against Boy Scouts of America policy for any boy that is not a WEBLO (4th or 5th grade) to carry a knife or multipurpose tool that has a knife And then only with a parent. What if another child had seen the knife and cut themselves or another child? Every one of you defending Zachary would be suing the school and his family. 45 day suspension was a bit much for the boy. The parents deserve every day of it for not teaching him properly and not putting the knife out of his reach.

                {"commentId":10082369,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"billthedad"}
                • 2 votes
                Reply#14 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:54 PM EDT
                {"commentId":10083284,"authorDomain":"thekeyfiles"}

                Well said!! I think his parents are definitely to blame for this. I know i would never let my child of that age have that device. My point exactly is that any kid could have gotten a hold of it and then we would see an entirely different response from someone else. I'd be upset if my child got a hold of someone else's knife and then was caught with it or hurt themselves or some other child... All caused by some other kid bringing it to school... smh

                {"commentId":10083284,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"thekeyfiles"}
                • 1 vote
                #14.1 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 4:38 PM EDT
                {"commentId":10091309,"authorDomain":"needstobesaid"}

                Exactly. IT IS A KNIFE! Not a utensil. A knife!! This policy should be enforced. This kid should not get special treatment because he's a "cute" little six year old. He's just a great actor, you gullible fools! 45 days in reform school is nothing! I remember in my school our zero tolerance policy was strict, and the penalty? One year expulsion for the first offense. I know because as a child I too was caught with what they are now calling a "utensil," a camping knife from my weekend girl scout trip. My parents tried to cop the b*llsh*t "camping tool" story too but my school had a steadfast zero tollerance policy that did not waiver and I was expelled. That was back in the 90's and I was mad about it then and felt a year of being expelled was kind of harsh, but now I see that it was necessary and prudent. An example must be made of these children making "mistakes" and putting every other child in danger. It fell out of his pocket? What if another child picked it up and got hurt. CHILDREN SHOULD NOT HAVE ACCESS TO KNIVES OR ANY OTHER WEAPONS!! And this kid was only going to get 45 days for bringing a WEAPON- NOT A UNTESIL-A WEAPON into school and endanger everyone else? Those white trash parents should be punished for giving A KNIFE to their SIX YEAR OLD KID. What lesson are we teaching these kids? Are all you people taking stupid pills?!? Why is he getting special treatment? No one knows his true intent they just know what his parents made him say to the camera all wide eyed and teary, so he would get away with it. This teaches kids everywhere that it is now ok to have a KNIFE in school as long as you call it some other name such as "utensil" or "camping tool". As long as we glaze over the fact that it is a KNIFE- A WEAPON with a fork and spoon attatched. How many euphemisms are there for KNIFE OR WEAPON? I guess "camping utensil" is now one of them.

                {"commentId":10091309,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"needstobesaid"}
                • 1 vote
                #14.2 - Thu Oct 15, 2009 1:12 AM EDT
                {"commentId":10095178,"authorDomain":"jim-1413275"}

                WEAPON, WEAPON. Kids have NO right to bring WEAPONS into school and SHOULD be sent home! That's all there is to it. SO, having said that, lessee.

                I read of a child who ended up in a coma after being hit, repeatedly, with his backpack. That's what he gets, I guess, for bringing that dangerous weapon to school. So, those gotta go. Just read about a a teenager beaten sensless by a group of schoolmates... punched and kicked... sustained major damage. So, I guess you gotta leave your feet and hands at home. While driving my daughter to school on Monday, police and paramedics surrounded a student on the ground. He'd been hit while crossing the street. That CERTAINLY makes cars weapons. We need to ban those from the entire school environment... make the kids walk... it'll be good for them.

                What we're missing here is anything, that's right, anything, can be used as a WEAPON. Books, pencils, pens, desks... the schoolroom is full of weapons. Let's not forget the gym. We've got baseball bats, rackets, etc. Who hasn't heard of a student athelete killed by a baseball's blow to the chest, or sustaining a terrible injury when hit by an opponent's helmeted head? Should we get rid of hard bats and helmets? Shoud the pitcher... should the tackler be arrested for brandishing a dangerous WEAPON? Nope, we call it an accident, talk to our kids about it, and play the next game.

                Lemme tell you about anouther ZERO TOLERANCE event. In New Hampshire, a father witnesses his daughter being grabbed and thrown in a van. The father jumped into his car and gave chase.. calling the police as he followed the van south toward Massachusetts. The authorities stopped the van just inside the Mass state line. When the officer approached the father's car, asking for the father's ID, POI, and registration, the dad opened his glove compartment exposing a legally registered and authorized pistol. The father had a permit for the firearm which was perfectly legal in New Hampshire. Mass, however, has a zero tolerance policy if you are found with firearm. So, guess what? Daddy went to prison for 2 years. Under the stress of watching his child kidnapped, he hadn't thought about removing the pistol... To ensure the kidnappers didn't get away, he reacted quickly and gave chase... Was he able to consider he might cross the state line?

                That's the great thing about zero tolerance. This kid had been using this tool for quite awhile. He knew how to use it properly... BSA rules notwithstanding. The rules determine who can carry a pocket knife to Cub Scout functions. Parents determine if their child can safely, respectfully, carry a pocket knife at other times.

                Folks, only when it's used to intentionally hurt someone is it a weapon.

                Lastly, what, on God's green earth, makes you think that a zero tolerance policy could have prevented Columbine? I"m pretty sure they'd have a problem with long guns and propane bombs in school. You don't need a zero tolerance policy for that.

                {"commentId":10095178,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"jim-1413275"}
                  #14.3 - Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:29 AM EDT
                  {"commentId":10097000,"authorDomain":"momof2scouts"}

                  Actually it is the Bear rank (3rd grade) that lets them earn their whittling chip (it is in the Bear Handbook). This allows them to carry a pocket knife to AUTHORIZED scouting events only. As far as it being just a utensil (I even heard our local news call it a spork) you are righe it's a knife. I believe that the boy's parents and his troop, which shouldn't have allowed him to use it at campouts anyway since at 6 he would just be a Tiger or Wolf, should have emphasized the importance of knife safety. But, on the other hand more than likely the boy just wanted to use, and possibly show off his new gadget at school. This obviously could have turned out bad. He could have hurt himself, or someone else could have gotten hurt. I really doubt that he meant any harm. Anyone who has kids would probably agree that they have caught their child doing somethin without thinking of the consequinces (not looking for cars in a parking lot, climbing on something too high, walking with scissors improperly, playing or fighting with another at the top of the stairs). The point is kids don't always think before they act, especially when they are younger. I do believe that there definately should have been some reprocussions to teach him how dangerous it is to carry a knife. But, they need consider age, a 6 year old may not know any better, a 10 year old would know better, but may not respect authority, or have ill intent. So 45 days for a 6 year old too extreme. If he went to reform school, he may come out worse than he was before, because of the kinds of kids he would be forced to be around. So in the long run, the punishment could actually make the situation worse.

                  {"commentId":10097000,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"momof2scouts"}
                    #14.4 - Thu Oct 15, 2009 11:49 AM EDT
                    Reply
                    {"commentId":10082544,"authorDomain":"thekeyfiles"}

                    I find it interesting how this article kept referring to it as a "utensil"! It took me to read all of the article to see that it was considered dangerous and that it was a "Knife", that's a far cry from a utensil. A fork, spoon, or spork (spoon/fork) is a utensil... but a knife is a knife. He brought a SWISS ARMY KNIFE to school... how can anyone not see that as an issue? Even his mother?

                    Although I don't believe he had an intention to hurt anyone, he never should have brought it to school. They did mention the no-tolerance policy as a way of blurring the lines of racial discrimination and the overwhelming disparage between disciplines handed out to African American children vs White or other, etc. I look at it and say, that anything could have happened and any kid could have gotten a hold on the weapon and either injured themselves or someone else. That's the real issue!

                    As for his expultion and reform school. I think that a child that age, needs to be in school and i would hate to see a child miss the much needed education. Of course there is home-schooling that can be done. Since he had no intentions to harm anyone and he no one was harmed, I would not keep him out that long, but he and his family would need to know that it can NEVER happen again for ANY reason and he will receive the full extent the next time for sure!

                    {"commentId":10082544,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"thekeyfiles"}
                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#15 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 4:02 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":10085151,"authorDomain":"concerned-future-parent"}

                    That is what I have been saying! The child brought a knife to school. All the people kept refering it to as a spoon and fork. They forgot a major part of his "utensil" and that is the fact that it is a knife! How can parents be ok with this or believe he did nothing wrong? How far will this policy go?

                    {"commentId":10085151,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"concerned-future-parent"}
                    • 1 vote
                    #15.1 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:16 PM EDT
                    Reply
                    {"commentId":10083062,"authorDomain":"thekeyfiles"}

                    The Key Files - keyfiles.blogspot.com

                    {"commentId":10083062,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"thekeyfiles"}
                      Reply#16 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 4:26 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":10084581,"authorDomain":"laurence-smith"}

                      I think this 6 year old boy should have been tried as an adult, locked up and then have attempted murder and assualt charges filed against him, and with at least a million dollar bond. This child obviously shows potential for being a serial killer, and thankfully an astute principal noticed what this child was up to, though this was probably after the pedophile school principle had sought to have sex with him. The fact that all that was needed was a phone call to the parent instead of making a federal case out of this incident shows the retardation level of school principals, teachers, etc.  

                       

                       

                       

                      {"commentId":10084581,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"laurence-smith"}
                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#17 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:47 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":10088553,"authorDomain":"notavalid"}

                      You owe me a new sarcasm meter - the needle on mine won't re-zero.

                      {"commentId":10088553,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"notavalid"}
                      • 1 vote
                      #17.1 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 9:31 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":10097784,"authorDomain":"torgo2009"}
                      torgo2009Deleted
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":10085107,"authorDomain":"concerned-future-parent"}

                      So I guess lets just change the no tolerance policy for one kid. Instead of having him learn from his mistake, lets just give him the message that with offenses such as bringing a knife to school, the punishment for him will not be as harsh. This is rediculous. It is a zero tolerance policy for a reason. What kind of message does that send to other students? A child could have been hurt by this kid and he gets a few days suspension? If a criminal committed a violent act, are we going to slap the kid on the wrist or give them a harsh punishment? Kids are supposed to learn from their mistakes, and this child will not learn. This was an unintelligent move on the school board. This child should not be celebrated for committing an offense against school policy.

                      {"commentId":10085107,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"concerned-future-parent"}
                        Reply#18 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:13 PM EDT
                        {"commentId":10086169,"authorDomain":"jimvghn"}

                        Unless I misunderstood, this little boy is an active boy scout or had something to do with boy-scouts. If this is true, then I would have a problem with the actions being taken against him, as in our county and most all of the areas around where we live, the boy-scouts all hold their meetings at the school. At all of the meetings the boys are given their badges and rewards for successfully completing different parts of their training. During these meetings they are instructed to come in uniform, with all of there this's and that's on which they have earned over the course of time. This particular knife is a boyscout issue style of knife. Now, on the other hand, I would expect with giving a little one of his age a tool, of this nature, would have come many talks on the do's and don'ts of having such a tool. Over all I think the school system needs to have situations be more circumstantial and consider the prior dangers exhibitedby the students in each situation. I would hope that this particular school is not one that holds weekly or biweekly boyscout meetings or they are seriously sending a mixed signal to the smaller children which are told it is OK to have it on their person one day but not the next. I am grateful that the parents are not willing to send him to a reform school for any amount of time as he is not a child that came to school wielding a weapon with the intent to do harm to anyone at anytime. It would not be a good atmosphereto put this child around other children who truly deserve to be there, and in most cases, need to be there. The school really needs to rethink their ruling on this matter as I guarantee it would have been nothing more than a simple misunderstanding if it had been the superintendent's child or someone else in that kind of position.

                        {"commentId":10086169,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"jimvghn"}
                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#19 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 7:13 PM EDT
                        {"commentId":10098134,"authorDomain":"torgo2009"}
                        torgo2009Deleted
                        Reply
                        {"commentId":10086668,"authorDomain":"kristina-a"}

                        I think most of us are missing a very important point. He is a boy scout, okay. Then that means he has no excuse, boy scouts are taught about safety and responsible actions and consequences, are they not. I know ours are.

                        It was published in writing in the school's policies that weapons are not allowed, zero tolerance. I bet his school expected that his parents would read and understand the school's policy. Why didn't his parents communicate to him that knives (even his little one) are weapons and not allowed at school? Where were they in the education of their son about weapons and weapon safety?

                        Shame on the school board for bending to the whims of these parents. And shame on the parents for crying to the media, instead of heading this off by teaching their son acceptable behavior. What happens next time Zachary brings a weapon to school, a bigger or more dangerous one? They changed the rules for him this time, will they next time, when it's a gun? The precedence has been set, the rules don't apply to Zachary.

                        {"commentId":10086668,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"kristina-a"}
                          Reply#20 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 7:41 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":10636893,"authorDomain":"annethefirst"}

                          It really doesn't matter that he was a Scout--how long can he have been in Scouts at the age of six--has he learned everything they teach in a few months? It is ridiculous to have a severe, zero-tolerance rule that would send a six-year-old to 45 days of "reform school" when he, in complete innocence, takes a knife/eating utensil to school. No one is protected and the offending child stands to lose much if such a rule is enforced. The message everyone received from his partial reprieve (remember--he was suspended for five days) is that justice can be just, and that schools can be reasonable rather than reacting in a severe, thoughtless, "knee-jerk" way to every challenge. The 45-day reform school sentence is in no way just or commensurate with the offence.

                          {"commentId":10636893,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"annethefirst"}
                            #20.1 - Thu Nov 12, 2009 10:49 AM EST
                            Reply
                            {"commentId":10087600,"authorDomain":"sskunkler"}

                            This is why No Tolerance policies are crazy. They turn school administrators into discipline technicians and do not allow for the people in charge to exercize their own discretion. Also, this is clearly a case of mistaken behavior not misbehavior. All rules in our nations school districts need to be age appropriate with the idea of guiding the children to internalize the appropriate behavior. What does this teach our children? What lesson did this boy take away from all of this? Why are the administrators hands tied? Boy, this is a lesson in how the crimes of Nazi Germany were allowed to happen...

                            {"commentId":10087600,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"sskunkler"}
                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#21 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 8:34 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":10088321,"authorDomain":"scoutbear"}

                            As a scout leader for 25 years and also a teacher this has been a very interesting forum to follow. I'm glad the administrators changed their mind and allowed the boy to attend school as each case should be determined individually not by a blanket statement. But as a scouter I'm concern that a 6yr old which is a Tiger Cub would be allowed to have that piece of equipment in the first place. 3rd graders are introduced to safe handling of knifes but as stated earlier only Webelos which are 4th and 5th graders are allowed to carry a knife after they have earned their wittlin chip(a knife safety program)and only with adult supervision.

                            {"commentId":10088321,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"scoutbear"}
                              Reply#22 - Wed Oct 14, 2009 9:17 PM EDT
                              {"commentId":10090675,"authorDomain":"cmrf"}

                              I think suspending the first graders is absurd!!!!!!!!! I have a 1st grader just like this liitle boy who also like to wear shirts & ties to school for no reason. My son is also in boy scouts & love to camp & go fishing. Even though my son has never taken any of his boys scout such or fishing stuff to school. I know he would never take them to harm someone. He might take an item because like the 6 year in the story & my son and most boys that age think these things are cool, they are neat. They don't view them as dangerous weapons or have any intent to use them as such. I think the boys should have been talked to about why we don't take those kind of things to school, and then maybe sent home for the remainder of the day. I think most kids this age still respect adults & what we tell them. And they understand when we tell them why things are the way they are. I think the school staff & school board both over reacted!!!!!!!!!! WHAT EVER HAPPEN TO COMMON SENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                              {"commentId":10090675,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"cmrf"}
                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#23 - Thu Oct 15, 2009 12:02 AM EDT
                              {"commentId":10091033,"authorDomain":"thequeenmary"}

                              I think he should have in school suspension. not reform school. It all depends on his behavior at school.

                              {"commentId":10091033,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"thequeenmary"}
                                Reply#24 - Thu Oct 15, 2009 12:37 AM EDT
                                {"commentId":10091381,"authorDomain":"needstobesaid"}

                                IT IS A KNIFE! Not a utensil. A knife!! This policy should be enforced. This kid should not get special treatment because he's a "cute" little six year old. He's just a great actor, you gullible fools! 45 days in reform school is nothing! I remember in my school our zero tolerance policy was strict, and the penalty? One year expulsion for the first offense. I know because as a child I too was caught with what they are now calling a "utensil," a camping knife from my weekend girl scout trip. My parents tried to cop the b*llsh*t "camping tool" story too but my school had a steadfast zero tollerance policy that did not waiver and I was expelled. That was back in the 90's and I was mad about it then and felt a year of being expelled was kind of harsh, but now I see that it was necessary and prudent. An example must be made of these children making "mistakes" and putting every other child in danger. It fell out of his pocket? What if another child picked it up and got hurt. CHILDREN SHOULD NOT HAVE ACCESS TO KNIVES OR ANY OTHER WEAPONS!! And this kid was only going to get 45 days for bringing a WEAPON- NOT A UNTESIL-A WEAPON into school and endanger everyone else? Those white trash parents should be punished for giving A KNIFE to their SIX YEAR OLD KID. What lesson are we teaching these kids? Are all you people taking stupid pills?!? Why is he getting special treatment? No one knows his true intent they just know what his parents made him say to the camera all wide eyed and teary, so he would get away with it. This teaches kids everywhere that it is now ok to have a KNIFE in school as long as you call it some other name such as "utensil" or "camping tool". As long as we glaze over the fact that it is a KNIFE- A WEAPON with a fork and spoon attatched. How many euphemisms are there for KNIFE OR WEAPON? I guess "camping utensil" is now one of them.

                                {"commentId":10091381,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"needstobesaid"}
                                  Reply#25 - Thu Oct 15, 2009 1:21 AM EDT
                                  {"commentId":10091667,"authorDomain":"luvenia48"}

                                  All I can say is some of you have given me even more reasons for begging my grandchildren not to reproduce. Are you so afraid that you would want to lock up children for something like this? I am a woman and as a child I had a knife and yet I never stabbed anyone. The world you people are describing is not a world I would want to bring up a child in. Schools today are more like prisons and they are the main reason more children are turning to crime and SUICIDE. I remember getting into fights and no one called the law. We would fight and make up. What you people need would be to wrap yourselves up and hide in the closet. You are not making us safer by turning our children into adults right out of the womb. Take at look at the laws that went into effect right before the crime rate went up. The more freedoms you take, the more people will fight back. I used my seat belt most of the time before it became a law but it pissed me off that my choice was taken away. America, land of the free, NOT anymore.

                                  {"commentId":10091667,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"luvenia48"}
                                    Reply#26 - Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:04 AM EDT
                                    {"commentId":10098183,"authorDomain":"torgo2009"}
                                    torgo2009Deleted
                                    Reply
                                    {"commentId":10093385,"authorDomain":"grandmotherof5"}

                                    Adults need to use common sense. The punishment way outweighed the boy's intent. I can understand the zero tolerance policy BUT to suspend this very innocent, honest looking 6 year old boy to a boys' reform school for 45 days seems ridiculous. What a scary experience for such a young fellow - what would he learn there - rebellion, no trust of adults, etc.? The knife should have been taken away, returned to his folks, he should have been reprimanded and told not to bring it to school again and given the reason - the school policy against such items - all in a calm and straightforward way. THEN, the whole incident should have been put down as a past experience and dropped. - Such a big deal! Perhaps we all can learn from this. We send a crushing punishment on an incident like this and YET, many adults allow their children to play violent video games and see violent movies - violence is part of their play. This is what we need to attack. What are adults thinking?!?

                                    {"commentId":10093385,"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257","authorDomain":"grandmotherof5"}
                                      Reply#27 - Thu Oct 15, 2009 8:44 AM EDT
                                      Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"701297","isPrivate":false}
                                      Leave a Comment:
                                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                      {"threadId":"701297","contentId":"3381257"}
                                      Start TrackingStart Tracking
                                      Stop TrackingStop Tracking

                                      Follow TODAYMoms to get e-mail or watchlist alerts whenever new content is published, or subscribe via RSS:

                                      RSS

                                      Other TODAYMoms

                                      advertisement

                                      Latest Posts